OTHER SCHOOLS: Duke beats Clemson due to a "foul" with 0.4 seconds left
- Spartans Illustrated Message Board
- 5 Replies
There has been a lot of discussion on the final play of the Duke/Clemson game last night:
Login to view embedded media
I have strong feelings on this situation. Frist, I do not see an obvious foul on this play. Was there some contact? Maybe. Did the Duke played actually initiate the contact? Maybe. Some people are saying that is it absolutely a foul Clemson. I am not convinced.
Some people like to argue that there should be no difference between a foul called with 0.4 seconds on the clock and one with 4 minutes left on the clock. In a perfect world where the games are officiated by an AI with perfect vision, I would agree. Unfortunately (or fortunately) we do not live in this world and therefore, this viewpoint, IMHO, is 100% wrong.
Officials are fallible, and I have seen contact like this let go on pretty much every drive to the basket by Hoggard and Walker this season. A call with 4 minutes remaining does not impact the result of a game. A call with 0.4 seconds on the clock does. It is not the same situation, and the refs need to be aware of this. The "burden of proof" to blow the whistle in this type of late game situation MUST be higher. This was a MAJOR screw up and these refs should be reprimanded. This crap is NOT acceptable.
And, of course, Duke benefits. The fact the Scheyer continues to get the Coach K white glove treatment is an embarrassment to the game. MSU did not get a fair whistle against those bozos in the Champions Classic. I am sick of it.
If I were the Clemson coach, I would have called a timeout after the Duke FTs, and absolutely given the refs a profanity laced earful. Earn the double technical. Pay the fine. This crap cannot be allowed to continue. I find it disgusting.
Also, if this is a foul, I would like to congratulate the 2010 Michigan State Spartans on a retroactive National Title in basketball.
Login to view embedded media
I have strong feelings on this situation. Frist, I do not see an obvious foul on this play. Was there some contact? Maybe. Did the Duke played actually initiate the contact? Maybe. Some people are saying that is it absolutely a foul Clemson. I am not convinced.
Some people like to argue that there should be no difference between a foul called with 0.4 seconds on the clock and one with 4 minutes left on the clock. In a perfect world where the games are officiated by an AI with perfect vision, I would agree. Unfortunately (or fortunately) we do not live in this world and therefore, this viewpoint, IMHO, is 100% wrong.
Officials are fallible, and I have seen contact like this let go on pretty much every drive to the basket by Hoggard and Walker this season. A call with 4 minutes remaining does not impact the result of a game. A call with 0.4 seconds on the clock does. It is not the same situation, and the refs need to be aware of this. The "burden of proof" to blow the whistle in this type of late game situation MUST be higher. This was a MAJOR screw up and these refs should be reprimanded. This crap is NOT acceptable.
And, of course, Duke benefits. The fact the Scheyer continues to get the Coach K white glove treatment is an embarrassment to the game. MSU did not get a fair whistle against those bozos in the Champions Classic. I am sick of it.
If I were the Clemson coach, I would have called a timeout after the Duke FTs, and absolutely given the refs a profanity laced earful. Earn the double technical. Pay the fine. This crap cannot be allowed to continue. I find it disgusting.
Also, if this is a foul, I would like to congratulate the 2010 Michigan State Spartans on a retroactive National Title in basketball.