DotComp: Get Your Grump On
Jim Comparoni | Editor
EAST LANSING - Grumpy, spoiled Spartan fans didn’t like this football game.
Michigan State didn’t win by enough, wasn't smooth enough, against a mediocre FCS opponent, Furman.
Most of the grumpy, spoiled Spartan fans - which is a new species of Michigan State supporter, spawned by Dantonio-era mutations - stayed until the end of the game, made noise in the stands, and generally got their money’s worth for the ticket they purchased.
But they didn’t want their money’s worth. They didn’t want a good, competitive game. They wanted a good performance from their Spartans, which would have produced a four- or five-touchdown margin of victory. And you can’t blame them for their distaste.
Don’t you hate it when grumpy, spoiled people are right?
We’ve waited eight months for the defending Big Ten Champion Spartans to begin to show that the off-season of disrespect they have endured has been inaccurate, ignorant, and unjust.
Instead, the Spartans didn’t play up to their No. 12 ranking.
So, after eight months of nothing to do but talk about college football, we are left with 14 days to talk some more about the things that didn’t go perfectly for Michigan State on this opening night before 74,516 on a clear, perfect evening for football that carried a hint of fall.
That’s why we love college football so much. There are so few games, and so much riding on them, that we end up doing nothing but talking and obsessing about what might happen next to the point that we all end up hating each other.
And that’s usually when the Spartans go back to work and improve under the cloak of apparent mediocrity.
This program performs best when mixed with early-season anxieties and dismissive critics.
And this 28-13 victory against Furman comes chock full of little morsels of mediocrity.
But first the positives:
1. Mark Dantonio.
The shot of him in his new glasses, arms folded, shaking his head slowly, disapprovingly, after a
Brandon Clemons false start in the third quarter was iconic Dantonio. It was like
John Wooden holding the rolled-up program, or
Frank Leahysmiling in a fedora, or
Woody Hayes straining in snow flurries while wearing Burger King-style short sleeves and tie. It was grand.
Michigan State finished with 10 penalties for 120 yards. The penalties killed Spartan drives, and fueled Furman drives. The drive-killers nearly drove Dantonio to kill.
But he’s too cool for that. He didn’t yell, didn’t rant, didn’t take anyone out back behind Beaumont Tower and put a bullet in anyone’s head.
He folded his arms, and shook his head disapprovingly, like a father looking at his son’s bad report card.
The penalties were angering Spartan fans. But when those watching the BTN telecast saw that shot of Dantonio, arms folded, shaking his head in calm, measured disappointment, they knew this little issue was in good hands.
I don’t know if this team is going to end up being all that great. But Dantonio is pretty great. And if this team can be great, he’s going to wring it out of them. Isn’t that what we’ve learned about him? And isn’t that why we have all these grumpy, spoiled Spartan fans, now?
2. I liked part of
Tyler O’Connor’s night. He was terrific when throwing on the move, whether on nakeds or waggles, or snaggles or fake-eds.
Actually, there’s no such thing as a snaggle or a fake-ed. But offensive playbooks are expanding so rapidly that we need to reserve words for future terminology. And Furman gave MSU a dose of new football on this night. More on that later.
As for the waggles and nakeds, O’Connor has the tools to bother defenses with his mobility, his arm, and the accuracy of that arm when moving the pocket.
He also showed great touch on out routes and fades to the corner when throwing from the hash to the wide side of the field. Opponents are going to have to defend the entire width of the field, because he can stretch you that way and drop it in the bucket, with his touch, and also his ability to throw on the run.
I like what I heard from his teammates about the leadership he showed on the sidelines when this game became a bit uncomfortable.
On the negative side, he held the ball a beat too long on a couple of occasions, especially when throwing from the pocket and making intermediate reads over the middle.
However, idiots like myself might have misread those missed reads. For instance, in SpartanMag's post-game V-Cast with our Associate Editor Paul Konyndyk, I mistakenly criticized O’Connor for holding the ball too long and staring down an outside receiver to his left when tight end
Josiah Price was open for a check down over the middle.
This happened on MSU’s second drive of the game. O’Connor held the ball, scampered out of the pocket while continuing to read the left sideline. He fumbled as he reached the boundary, but the ball bounced safely, luckily out of bounds.
I gently criticized O’Connor for locking in on a receiver. That’s after seeing the play once live, and then a replay in the press box. Then, an hour after the game, Paul and I try to act like we know what we’re talking about. And I usually THINK I know what I’m talking about during those V-Casts. And most of it I think is somewhat credible. And since this is merely football, and not something important like local millage analysis, no one gets hurt if I err a little bit - except maybe the immediate families of the coaches and players. Come to think of it, those people are real human beings, so maybe I should be more careful. But we’re on deadline, you know?
So anyway, after watching a replay of that play, I noticed that running back
L.J. Scottjust kind of drifted out on a pass route and coasted into space. He didn’t make a cut, didn’t turn to make himself available for a pass. He just drifted.
O’Connor seemed to be locking in on Scott, waiting for him to run the route the quarterback expected from him.
That would explain O’Connor waiting and waiting and staring down a receiver. Scott was the receiver.
I thought O'Connor was looking farther downfield. But when I watched it again, I noticed that he was looking at Scott. He was trying to hit his check-down. But his check-down didn’t sufficiently check with the guy who had the ball (O’Connor).
O’Connor had a word with Scott after the play.
After seeing a play like that, this post-game quote from O’Connor began to make more sense to me: “I think the biggest thing is getting comfortable with everybody around me,” O’Connor said. “I think there were some jitters across the offense. We have to get on the same page across all scenarios.
“We need to get a feel for how we are going to attack Notre Dame. That is 15 days away, so we have a lot of time for us to figure all of that out. I just really need to get comfortable with everyone - the offensive line and the running backs and the wide receivers.”
The offensive line? There were times when O’Connor didn’t quite trust the pass protection and didn’t hang in the pocket long enough. Just once or twice, but enough to notice.
The receivers? Remember when O’Connor threw deep to Monty Madaris on a post, durin MSU's second possession? He threw it kind of flat, and patted the ball a little too long before attempting it. He telegraphed it, which allowed the back-side safety time to come over and knock it away.
After the incompletion, Madaris pointed to the sky, indicating that he felt he could have made a play on the ball if O’Connor had sailed it higher and deeper. That’s part of the comfort level needed between quarterback, receiver and the moment on the big stage.
Madaris and O’Connor are a pair of fifth-year seniors who came to Michigan State as part of the same recruiting class, from the same state (Ohio), and played on the scout team together.
They served as second- and third-stringers behind guys who are now in the NFL.
And now O’Connor and Madaris have a chance to show that they aren’t merely functional college football players, but can star at this level for a Top 10 team.
On Friday night, Madaris certainly had that look about him. And O’Connor had some good moments, with enough high-end plays to suggest that his ceiling of potential is pretty strong for his senior season.
But even these guys, who have worked together for so long, weren't entirely on the same page, all night.
O’Connor and Scott are going to be on the field a lot together this season. They were a little too awkward with one other in this game.
Example: On the play after
Andrew Dowell’s terrific interception. MSU attempted to spring Scott down the right sideline as a receiver. He became wide open, on a wheel route of sorts. But O'Connor's pass missed badly. I'm not sure if O'Connor threw it wrong, threw inaccurately, or if Scott failed to open up to the ball correctlly and run his steps right.
That play should have went for 15 or more yards and served as a big momentum boost after the interception. Instead, the pass fell incomplete, and the grumpy Spartan fans groaned about the missed opportunity.
The play call and play design were sublime. But the quarterback and receiver weren’t on the same page.
Michigan State has had some sluggish season-openers during the Dantonio era. But I’m kind of surprised that there would be these basic route-and-throw miscommunications after 15 spring practices, and an August of camp.
I assume these are among the more correctable issues that the Spartans will be tackling for the next couple of weeks.
As for other positives:
3. Spartan fans. Even the grumpy ones. They showed up, filled seats on the first day of a holiday weekend that never used to be about college football.
4. R.J. Shelton looked good as a punt returner. But he got a little dinged up and had to come out of the game. Dantonio said it was a minor injury and he’ll be fine. I took to that to mean that he will be back for the Notre Dame game.
And I like Shelton as a punt returner. But can MSU afford to put him in harm’s way on special teams? I think so. MSU needs the open-field threat in the punt return game, something the Spartans haven’t had since 2013 when
Macgarrett Kings was a sophomore.
5. The fullbacks. Prescott Line was a hammerhead basher as a lead blocker. And he had a carry on second-and-one on a FB dive on the opening drive of the night. That guy looks like a veteran of the program.
Delton Williams is second-string fullback. And he’s got something to offer, too.
Most of us have been writing about him as a potential mismatch player as a fullback (an idea that really doesn’t apply to today’s football. Back in the old days of two-back offenses, a team could isolate a fast fullback on a big, unsuspecting Sam linebacker for a downfield pass play, once or twice a month).
(But big Sam linebackers don’t exist anymore. They became extinct when defenses had to start chasing these spread offenses around the field. So the idea of a mismatch fullback doesn’t quite exist anymore because all three linebackers are faster than they used to be. In fact, fullbacks don’t exist much anymore - although Michigan State still keeps one or two in captivity, kind of like zoo animals, so that local school children can come to the football building on field trips to make sketches of them.
Aside from those educational outreach programs, the fullbacks in East Lansing still find function as blockers in old style run plays invented in the 1800s at the end of the industrial revolution. Many of those plays still work today, partly because defenses no longer carry antibiotics to combat this particular strain of football. That’s partly why Stanford keeps ending up in the Rose Bowl, like an annual flu virus.
Anyway, Delton Williams accepts his new role as a fullback, and seems to like it. He’s not quite big enough to be a thumping fullback, but they say he is willing.
What I like about Williams is how fast he gets out to his targets and landmarks as a blocker. This has the potential to be truly revolutionary.
There was a play in the first half when tailback
Madre London carried to the left on an outside zone play. Left guard
Benny McGowan performed a front-side pull and blocked the play-side linebacker.
Williams, at fullback, had a free release out to the play-side cornerback. Williams sprinted out to the cornerback faster than any fullback I can remember. He didn’t destroy the cornerback, but he got out on him so quickly that it knocked the cornerback off-kilter and out of the picture.
London was brought down by a desperate ankle tackle from the middle linebacker. If the middle linebacker doesn’t make that shoe-string tackle, London probably would have went 49 yards for a touchdown and I’d be praising that block by Williams - not because he thumped the cornerback, but because he stalked him with uncommon speed for the blocking back position.
That play only went for a gain of two, but the speed of Williams at fullback is something that play-design Picaso Jim Bollman can make use of in his 19th-century run game art studio.
6. There were no dropped passes.
7. O’Connor dialed in on the tight ends in the red zone. Good choices.
8.
Malik McDowell was occasionally dominant.
9.
Byron Bullough came off the bench for a big stop on third down. A few plays earlier,
Riley Bullough, Chris Frey and defensive tackles had trouble reading, diagnosing and fitting some of the surprise looks they were getting from Furman.
Byron came in and made an aggressive, smart stick, presumably while Riley was getting some instruction form his cornermen.
10.
Darian Hicks got picked on, and picked on, and picked on, and was called for a pair of pass interference penalties … but did he give up any receptions? Not that I can think of.
As for the pass interference penalties, his hip-turn, feet and burst put him in position to make those plays, but he didn’t seem to trust himself enough to turn and look in time.
The cornerbacks aren’t supposed to turn and look until and unless that have caught up, hip-to-hip, with the receiver. So he might not have been entirely wrong in failing to turn and look.
On one of those pass interference penalties, the pass was under-thrown. If the ball had been thrown accurately, he would have been in position to rake the ball out as the receiver’s hands lit up, although that’s not an ideal situation for a cornerback.
There seems to be a bit of a panic and lack of confidence with Hicks in how he plays these receivers. He needs to get over that and realize that his feet and hips are pretty good. This won’t be the last opponent that tests him and tests him and tests him.
But, correct me if I’m wrong, he passed those tests on this night. And he went against some fairly decent receivers.
The pass interference penalties were costly, but even the great
Pat Narduzzi used to say that he would like the cornerbacks to get a pass interference play once in a while, because that indicates a combative level of play. Well, Hicks provided those on this night. And Hicks used to be a Narduzzi guy, back in 2013 when Hicks saw regular time in the nickel defense for Narduzzi as a true freshman.
Meanwhile, count Hicks among those who needs to show marked improvement between game one and game two. We’ve been saying that about Hicks for three or four years. Injuries have been an issue in the past. But he’s healthy now, and he’s going to get tested at Notre Dame like crazy.
11.
Dowell’s interception. He had some unsure moments at other times in the game. But the interception was a special play, right when MSU needed it most.
12.
Demetrious Cox. He was outstanding at safety. His pursuit angles were correct, and he carried them out with speed and force. In pass defense, he helped tighten up MSU’s red zone defense with his ability to play press coverage on slot receivers. MSU saves its across-the-board press coverage for when the field shrinks. And when it does, Cox is a trump card extraordinaire as a third corner. His pass break-up against their top receiver,
Andrej Suttles, in the third quarter was badness.
Cox is becoming an eraser, against the run and the pass. He’s going to have a big season.
13. Punter
Jake Hartbarger was a weapon.
14. The one or two times I focused in on right tackle
Miguel Machado, he was moving and smashing like a mother jumper. I think he’s got it now. But I need to watch it again.
15. How cool is
Benny McGowan? He’s a senior and he doesn’t mind being the sixth man of the offensive line. He spent the first series on the bench, played right guard (in for Clemons) on the second series, played center (in for
Kodi Kieler) on the third series, and played left guard (in for
Brian Allen) on the fourth series.
So, four possessions into the game, all four of those guys had played equally. McGowan’s versatility makes him an asset that should serve all four players, and all three positions, all year.
16.
L.J. Scott’s decisiveness as a runner was good. His make-you-miss ability seems to have improved, possibly due to losing 10 or 12 pounds.
L.J. Scott was tough, quick, decisive.
As for the negatives:
1. O’Connor forced a pass intended for
Felton Davis, into double- or triple-coverage on one occasion. But I was left wondering whether Davis might have taken his route too far downfield. Still, O’Connor had other check down options that I suspect he will wish he had gone to when he watches it on film.
2. In the final episode of BTN’s “Green and White Days,” Dantonio told the players after the final scrimmage of August camp that there were too many penalties on that day, and there were too many passes thrown down the middle of the field, dangerously.
And then in this game against Furman there were … too many penalties and one or two too many passes thrown dangerously down the middle of the field.
Obviously, that stuff needs to get cleaned up if MSU wants to make a run at a sixth 11-win season in seven years.
3. The d-line didn’t provide a pass rush. I’ll need to watch again and zero in on what was happening up front. It’s not like Furman’s QB was operating a quick-release passing game that didn’t give d-linemen a chance to get home. Their QB was throwing from the pocket and didn’t get affected nearly enough.
4. There were some gap assignment errors on some of those gainers that Furman enjoyed on inside run plays.
For instance, Furman gained 11 yards on the first play of their second possession when McDowell vacated his weak-side A-gap. He saw the blocking back and the ball carrier headed toward the B-gap. McDowell vacated his assignment and tried to jump a gap and head off the ball carrier.
The problem for McDowell and MSU is that the Furman RB detected the daylight at McDowell’s unmanned gap, cut in that direction and ran through the unmanned gap and sprinted north for a gain of 11.
That will be an easy film room correction. And the next time you hear Dantonio or Spartans talk about the occasional run game problems against Furman, they’ll say that players need to do their job and trust that their teammates will do theirs. It’s a cliché, but that phraseology is layman’s terms for the need to be gap sound.
5. The penalties and turnovers, obviously.
6.
Michael Geiger missed a field goal. He ranked 14th in the Big Ten in field goal accuracy last year. He was 1-of-2 on this night. That’s not a good start.
One final takeaway:
Players spend hours and hours and hours and hours watching opponent game film in order to get prepared for what they’ll see on game day. If they really, really, really watch film and get to know the tendencies, it gives them the half-step edge they need to try to make plays, limit gains and prevent the chains from moving.
So what would happen if defensive players didn’t watch film?
The answer? You saw it on Friday night.
Michigan State’s players watched a lot of film. But the film they watched wasn’t the same outfit that they played against. Furman changed most of its offense for this game.
An offense can’t change all that much DURING a season. Teams spend all spring and August putting in an offense and working to become proficient at it. An offense can’t burn time on TOO MANY plays and packages and formations. An offense has to choose its material and attempt to master it. A team can add packages and plays to its base offense as a season progresses. But a team can't overhaul its offense at midseason the way Furman did this off-season.
For the rest of the year, Furman’s opponents will have this film of its game against MSU. Furman will no longer be able to surprise opponents.
But Furman surprised MSU. Much of what MSU saw on film and practiced against turned out to be a waste of time.
“We weren’t expecting, to be honest, any of that stuff that they threw at us,”
Riley Bullough said.
Furman put in the new offense during spring practice and August camp.
“They changed their plan from last year,” Dantonio said. “They had a fullback-oriented team (last year). They ran some three wide receiver sets, but it was a different type of offense, completely from what they did this year. Pistol, dive, the run pass-options, RPO's, the option itself in the second half.”
They didn’t show the speed option stuff until after halftime, in order to limit MSU’s ability to meet and talk about it.
In the manly art of tackle football, the first 60 minutes of surprise-element offense are the best. Furman coach
Bruce Fowler’s tactics were straight out of
Sun Tzu’s Art of War for Football, if such book were ever published.
Fowler determined when and where he would implement his art of deception. Those are Tsu’s teachings to a T.
As a result, Fowler’s college of 2,000 students nearly repelled Dantonio’s college of 40,000.
And somehow we all went home unsatisfied.
We probably should have stood and applauded. That’s one difference between football and opera. At opera, we don’t care who loses or looks ugly.
The disapproving man with the folded arms and new glasses warned us something like this was possible. Dantonio told us that when a venerable coach such as Fowler (who used to be d-coordinator at Vanderbilt) has been head coach at a place for six years, there’s reason for caution. Dantonio figured Fowler would have a sharp plan.
“They hung around,” Dantonio said of Furman. “And they hung around because they played well, not because of a fluke.”
MSU has 25 more scholarship players than Furman, and much more recruiting pull. But Furman found equalizers, first with the surprise offense. Michigan State was a willing stooge, with its penalties and a pair of turnovers.
In the end, Michigan State scored twice as many points.
Could Michigan State have spent spring practice and August camp devising surprises for Furman. Yes. But there are only so many practices, only so much meeting time. A team can’t have EVERYTHING in its playbook. A team must pick and choose its battles and mind its resources.
Michigan State’s mode of operation on offense and defense has been very successful in the past nine years. There is no need for overhauls and facelifts at Michigan State. But there are annual tweaks and improvements. Michigan State won’t begin to show some of them, until 14 days from now, at Notre Dame.
“You are never going to show everything the first game I guess, but you better be ready for the second game,” Dantonio said. “We need to be able to get better. Hopefully the second game usually you are little bit more loose, a little bit more experienced but again a great challenge awaits us in South Bend but we've got time.”